🔗 Share this article

An activist organization has stated to have scraped a vast number of songs from Spotify and is getting ready to publish them online.

Potential Boost for AI Training

Observers noted the seeming data breach could aid artificial intelligence firms looking for material to train their technology.

A group called Anna’s Archive reported it had obtained 86 million audio tracks from the platform and 256 million rows of associated data such as artist and record names. Spotify, which carries more than 100 million tracks, confirmed that the leak did not represent its entire inventory.

“We have located and deactivated the malicious user accounts that engaged in illegal scraping,” stated a company representative.

The Swedish company, which has more than 700 million subscribers worldwide, added that an inquiry into unauthorised access found a external actor scraped public metadata and used questionable tactics to bypass DRM [digital rights management].

Archive's Stated Mission and Concerns

The streaming service does not think the music acquired by Anna’s Archive has been made public yet. Anna’s Archive, which is recognized for offering links to copyright-infringing books, wrote in a blog it wanted to create a ‘historical repository’ for music.

They claimed the music files accounted for 99.6% of all music streamed to by Spotify users and would be shared via ‘torrents’, a means of sharing large digital files online.

“Of course the service doesn’t have all the music in the world, but it’s a fantastic start,” said Anna’s Archive, which describes its mission as “safeguarding humanity’s information and culture”.

Model Development and Copyright Battleground

Ed Newton-Rex for protecting artists’ copyright, remarked the breached music would likely be used for training AI models.

“Educating models on pirated data is unfortunately common in the tech sector, so this stolen music is highly likely to end up instructing AI models,” he stated.

The group's website alludes to a large online archive, a huge online repository of copyrighted books that has allegedly been used by the parent company of Facebook to develop its systems.

A founder of an artificial intelligence company posted on LinkedIn that members of the public could in theory “build their own personal free equivalent of the service”. He said it could also enable tech companies to “train on modern music at scale”.

Copyright has become a battleground between artists, writers and content creators on one side and AI companies on the other.

Government Considerations and Reactions

Across Britain, artists and writers have raised concerns against a ministerial suggestion to allow AI companies utilize copyright-protected work without consent unless the rights holder signals. Almost every respondent to a government consultation on the idea has backed artists’ concerns.

The secretary of state for technology, research and development informed parliament this month there was “little consensus” on the issue, noting that ministers would “use the time to get this right”. The administration has pledged to make regulatory plans on AI and copyright by next year.